Five prophetic predictions
on the presidential election
The tabloids are great about giving us the
latest prophetic updates such as “Six beloved prophets agree End Times began
Sept. 16 at 4:42 p.m.” Not to be outdone, I want to issue my own
prophetic predictions for the coming presidential elections and presidency:
1) Between now and the November
election, I will hear some Christian leaders assure me that a given candidate
and that candidate alone is the only responsible choice for fellow Christians.
2) Various Christian leaders
will give this unqualified support to more than one candidate.
This is one of the more vexing
political issues for people of faith. We can read the same Bible, believe
fervently in the same Jesus, say our prayers and decide to vote for different
candidates. If all Christians readily agreed, then perhaps there would be a
clear Christian choice. But all the people in the same church won’t even agree
come the general election and this is an even more vexing issue during the
primary season.
Perhaps this problem of even
people of the same faith not agreeing with one another is why the framers of
our Constitution steered well clear of the problem in enshrining the notion
that no particular set of religious beliefs would be required of office
holders.
The third
paragraph of article six of the U.S. Constitution notes that members of each
branch of the government, “shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support
this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a
qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
Those holding office are bound
to support the Constitution, but not any given faith. Despite this prohibition
of a religious test for those elected to office, I am going to go out on a limb
and predict:
3) The religious beliefs and
moral convictions of the candidates will receive increasing scrutiny between
now and November.
This is perfectly appropriate
as while no religious test may be given by the government, each voter is free
to make his or her choice based on whether criteria is most meaningful to him
or her. It’s the government that can’t use religious beliefs to determine who
is in office and who is out. I may and will have my religious convictions
inform my choice of candidate.
My beliefs make me
who I am and inform all the decisions I make. Of course, my faith will be a
factor in deciding for whom I will vote. I can’t do otherwise than to see
political issues through my own biblical world view. And while I am a
professional reader of scripture, I am not alone in that every one of us votes
based on the issues that matter most to us.
Jesus taught his
followers to take care of widows and orphans, to defend the poor and the
outcast, and to live out the love we have for God in loving our neighbors as
ourselves. Of course we will see these ideals as having implications for how we
cast our votes. Yet despite this agreement that issues dearest to our heart
will determine how we vote, I predict:
4) No matter who is elected as
the next President of the United States of America, some Christians will be
elated thinking that this is God’s will, while some others will wonder how it
happened that God didn’t get God’s way with the electorate.
This is where we need to be in
love and charity with our neighbor, extending the greatest possible charity.
Politics has become increasingly divisive and talk of red state and blue state
has come to sound so black and white when any given red state is usually only
fifty-something percent for a republican, while a blue state is only
fifty-something percent for a democrat. Yet they are presented as if a given
state is in agreement about something.
Take our own state
for example. The only thing most Georgians can agree on is that anyone who
still wants to live in a state that measures its snowfall in feet rather than
inches can’t be completely right in the head.
Clearly we are a
mixed bag. This is fine as Jesus Christ is neither Republican nor Democrat as
he is not even American in any exclusive sense. Perhaps the ultimate
independent, Jesus stands beyond all political parties and systems as each
party and system is human and therefore far from perfect. Political systems
offer great benefits yet will always fall short of the Kingdom of God.
Each of us can get
a little heated when discussing political issues dear to our heart. This is
when it will help to remember Jesus’ admonition not to judge. For when you see
someone else as being unchristian for supporting a given candidate, you are
judging someone’s relationship with God based on some outward stand and not on
the content of the person’s heart.
Paul wrote in the
second chapter of his letter to the Romans, “Therefore you have no excuse,
whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgment on another you
condemn yourself.”
Give the person
with whom you disagree the benefit of the doubt, knowing that we can read the
same Bible, pray to the same God and yet hold different views on government
regulation, taxes and when and how to use military might.
My final prediction is the most
problematic, but I believe it fervently and can’t let it go without saying:
5) God can use whoever is
elected and that person will need the prayerful support of all people of
religious convictions.
I want to name this early,
before the campaign rhetoric gets too heated. In the second chapter of Paul’s
first letter to Timothy, we are told, “I urge that supplications, prayers,
intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for everyone, for kings and all who
are in high positions, so that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all
godliness and dignity.”
These prayers were being
offered for some decidedly immoral Roman Emperors. How much more should we pray
for our own government which makes room for and protects our religious beliefs.
Despite how divided we get during elections, we remain one nation under God.
(The Rev. Frank Logue is pastor
of King of Peace Episcopal Church in Kingsland.)
previous
Return to Religion Column page
next |